Medical
  • Research and White Papers
  • November 2024

Consumed by Bisphenol A (BPA): What are we really eating?

Products that could have BPA in them.
In Brief

Studies strongly suggest a link between exposure to BPA and reproductive disorders, certain cancers, metabolic dysfunction, and neurodevelopmental disorders in children. In this article from RGA's ReFlections newsletter, Hilary Henly explores BPA's potential health impacts and implications for insurers. 

Abstract

  • Estimates indicate that nearly a quarter of all human diseases and disorders result from environmental factors, which play a role in approximately 80% of deadly diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes.
  • Over the past two decades, global organizations have raised concerns about endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as bisphenol A (BPA), and their impact on human health. People are exposed to BPA via canned food, cardboard food trays, drink containers, dental products, and infant feeding products, as well as air and water pollution. 
  • Studies strongly suggest a link between human exposure to BPA and reproductive disorders, hormone-sensitive cancers (such as breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer), metabolic dysfunction, and neurodevelopmental disorders in children.
  • As younger generations experience greater long-term exposure to chemicals like BPA, the insurance industry could see changes to incidence and prevalence rates for associated diseases and disorders. 

Introduction

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an organic compound used in the making of certain plastics and epoxy resins. It is present in everyday items, such as food and drink containers, paper products, toys, medical and dental products (e.g., dental sealants and fillings), cigarette filters, and building materials. Studies suggest that more than 90% of human exposure to BPA comes from food contamination.2 Although oral exposure to BPA is most common, it also can be inhaled or absorbed through the skin and stored in human fat tissue.3 BPA can induce insulin resistance, adipogenesis, cell dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress. It can cross the blood-brain barrier and placenta, and is found in biological fluids and tissues, including urine, blood, amniotic fluid, placental tissue, brain tissue, umbilical cord blood, breast milk, and human colostrum.4

BPA has been detected in more than 90% of the North American population.5 The current FDA limit is 50 micrograms (µg) per kilogram of body weight per day (µg/kg/day).6 Yet recent studies show that as little as 0.2 ug/kg/day can harm health.7 In 2012, the FDA amended its regulations, banning the use of BPA in infant bottles and sippy cups, and in 2013 prohibited its use in coating materials for infant formula packaging.8

The Canadian government states that BPA does not pose a health risk to people, including infants. However, they also note it is illegal to advertise, import, manufacture, or sell baby bottles that contain BPA, and they have phased out packaging for infant formula containing BPA.9 Similarly, the UK’s Food Standards Agency (FSA) does not consider BPA to be harmful but restricts it from product material intended for use in infant and toddler food packaging. The FSA adopted a tolerable daily intake (TDI) limit of 0.2µg/kg/day, which is considered the daily amount of BPA a person can consume over their lifetime without being harmed.10

Meanwhile, the European Union’s European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) limits have evolved over time. In 2015, the EFSA reduced the TDI of BPA from 0.05 mg/kg to 4µg/kg body weight a day.11 In April 2023, the EFSA further reduced the TDI levels to 0.2 nanograms* (0.0002 µg) per kg of body weight.12

*(1µg = 1000ng)

Woman sitting at a desk working on a laptop
You need a partner with the financial strength, global reach, and local insights to help you with your life and health risk.

BPA and disease development

Reproductive system disorders 

BPA is known to have adverse effects on human health, especially the reproductive system.  It can cause pathological changes in the placenta and obstetric complications, such as decreased fetal growth, miscarriage, pre-term birth, and pre-eclampsia. Additional adverse effects include endometrial hyperplasia, development of ovarian cysts, and infertility. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the global lifetime infertility prevalence estimates from 1990-2021 were 17.5%, or approximately one in six people experiencing infertility in their lifetime.13 Many experts have associated this high rate with higher exposure to BPA. 

Studies indicate a relationship between increased levels of BPA in men and their semen quality/infertility,14 with fetal exposure to BPA known to affect the quality and quantity of sperm.3 In some regions, recorded sperm counts have declined by as much as 50% over the past 50 years.1 

Mothers with higher BPA plasma concentrations risk a shorter pregnancy duration or premature rupture of membranes.14 In fact, pre-term birth rates in the US have risen by more than 30% since 1981. In 2020, the pre-term birth rate in the US was 10.0%, which was higher than the global average of 9.9%.15 By 2022, the US rate rose to 10.4%, the highest figure in 10 years.16 The risk of mortality and morbidity in pre-term infants increases according to the degree of prematurity.

Cancer

Research connects BPA to the development of hormonal-related cancers, such as breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. BPA binds to estrogen receptors, such as Erα and Erβ, which are expressed in more than 60% of human breast cancers. The abnormal expression of estrogen receptors leads to the development of breast, ovarian, and low-grade endometrial cancer.

In addition, studies show that BPA can cause resistance to well-known chemotherapy drugs, including doxorubicin, cisplatin, carboplatin, tamoxifen, bevacizumab, PARP inhibitors, and vinblastine.7

BPA also influences the development of male cancers, such as prostate cancer and testicular germ cell cancer, and has been linked to the development of acute myeloid leukemia, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatic cancer, head and neck cancer, thyroid cancer, and osteosarcoma.3 In 2022, over 1.8 million cases of cancer were diagnosed in the US, which had one of the highest age-standardized incidence rates worldwide at 303.6 cases per 100,000 population.17

According to a 2024 analysis examining differences in cancer rates of US adults born between 1920 and 1990, 17 out of 34 cancer variations experienced increasing incidence in younger birth cohorts. Of these 17 cancers, nine had previously shown declining incidence in older birth cohorts, including estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, uterine corpus cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, and testicular cancer. This may reflect exposure to carcinogenic factors during early life compared to older generations, as well as an increasing incidence in obesity rates. Indeed, the fastest rise in obesity rates has occurred in those aged 2-19 years. Suspected risk factors for the rise in cancer rates among young lives include unhealthy diet, sedentary lifestyle, and exposure to environmental chemicals in early life.18

Figure 1: Birth cohort incidence and mortality rate ratio trends from 1920 to 1990 for six cancers with reversing trends in incidence compared with older birth cohorts in the US from 2000 to 201918

Birth cohort incidence and mortality rate ratio trends from 1920 to 1990 for six cancers with reversing trends in incidence compared with older birth cohorts in the US from 2000 to 2019

 

Neurodevelopmental and childhood disorders

Neurobehavioral disorders represent EDC exposure’s largest health impact in the US.

Gestational exposure to BPA interferes with pre-natal brain development while increasing the risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), depression, poor language development, sleep disorders, and uncontrolled behaviors, including aggression, destruction, and hyperactivity.1

Mothers with high BPA concentrations were 3.7 times more likely to give birth to sons with a low language score. Autistic children have shown heightened oxidative stress due to increased exposure to BPA, while ADHD was found to be more common in formula-fed infants in 2007. Infant exposure to BPA has decreased in recent years with the introduction of regulations banning its use in baby bottles and infant formula packaging.4

The prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children increased from approximately 13% in 1997 to 17% in 2022. Concerns have emerged regarding the increasing prevalence of ADHD, where the percentage of children aged 4-17 years with ADHD rose from 7.8% to 9.5% between 2003 and 2007, a 21.8% increase.19

Pediatric cancers are also a concern. Children under the age of five have experienced increasing incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), ependymal tumors, neuroblastoma, and hepatoblastoma.20 Neonatal or early-life exposure to BPA is a risk factor for developing prostate cancer in later life.

Other disorders

Research indicates that BPA plays a negative role in thyroid disorders, non-alcoholic steatosis, osteoarthritis, inflammatory bowel conditions, alteration of the gut microbiome, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and neurotoxicity.21

While there are some known lifestyle causes – such as poor diet and lack of physical activity – that contribute to increased diabetes and obesity rates, EDCs are understood to have a significant impact by promoting metabolic dysfunction. Initial studies show that BPA can cause changes in human blood glucose levels and insulin resistance, while increased urinary BPA levels in adolescent children have been positively associated with metabolic syndrome.14 Metabolic-disrupting chemicals have also been linked to the abnormal growth of fat mass, which causes weight gain by altering the endocrine system responsible for metabolism and appetite.1

The association of BPA with all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk

Although studies to date suggest BPA exposure increases the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality, this association is difficult to prove and quantify without deliberately exposing humans to these chemicals and examining the results. However, some studies do support this association:

  • A study using NHANES data (2003-2016) showed that the highest tertile of urinary BPA levels, when compared to the lowest group, was linked to a 36% increase in all-cause mortality, a 19% increase in cancer mortality, and a 62% increase in CVD mortality. A low urinary BPA level and high dietary quality had the lowest all-cause and CVD mortality (HR 0.42 and 0.30, respectively).21
  • In another study using NHANES data (2003-2008), when comparing the highest and lowest urinary BPA levels, all-cause mortality in adults age 20 and older was HR 1.49, while CVD mortality was HR 1.46.22
  • In a study of nearly 9,000 patients with hyperlipidemia, all-cause mortality was 20% higher among the highest tertile of urinary BPA vs. the lowest group.23

Conclusion

BPA has emerged as a significant public health concern. Over the past two decades, the incidence of female and male reproductive disorders has risen rapidly, as have the rates of neurobehavioral disorders in children and certain cancers. The consumption of, and exposure to, BPA is purported to have significant consequences for future generations worldwide and contribute substantially to disease and reduced lifespan. 


 

More Like This...

Meet the Authors & Experts

Hilary Henly
Author
Hilary Henly
Global Medical Researcher, Strategic Research 

References

  1. Gore, A.C. et al. (2024). Endocrine disrupting chemicals: threat to human health. Pesticides, plastics, forever chemicals, and beyond. Endocrine Society & IPEN. Available from: edc-report2024finalcompressed.pdf (endocrine.org
  2. Dumitrascu, M.C. et al. (2020). Carcinogenic effects of bisphenol A in breast and ovarian cancers (Review). Oncology Letters 20: 282, 2020. Available from: Carcinogenic effects of bisphenol A in breast and ovarian cancers - PMC (nih.gov)
  3. Khan, N.G. et al. (2021). A comprehensive review on the carcinogenic potential of bisphenol A: clues and evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021); 28: 19643-19664. Available from: A comprehensive review on the carcinogenic potential of bisphenol A: clues and evidence - PMC (nih.gov) 
  4. Costa, H.E. et al. (2024). Effects of bisphenol A on the neurological system: a review update. Archives of Toxicology 2024; 98: 1-73. Available from: Effect of bisphenol A on the neurological system: a review update | Archives of Toxicology (springer.com) 
  5. Liu, Z.Y. et al. (2023). Does anti-inflammatory diet mitigate the deleterious effect of bisphenol A on mortality in US adults? Results from NHANES 2003–2016. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety; 253: 114706. Available from: Does anti-inflammatory diet mitigate the deleterious effect of bisphenol A on mortality in US adults? Results from NHANES 2003–2016 (sciencedirectassets.com) 
  6. Virginia Department of Health (2023). Bisphenol A. Public Health Toxicology. Available from: Bisphenol A - Environmental Health (virginia.gov)
  7. Hafezi, S.A., Abdel-Rahman, W.M. (2019). The endocrine disruptor bisphenol A (BPA) exerts a wide range of effects in carcinogenesis and response to therapy. Current Mol Pharmacol, 2019; 12(3): 230-238. Available from: The Endocrine Disruptor Bisphenol A (BPA) Exerts a Wide Range of Effects in Carcinogenesis and Response to Therapy - PubMed (nih.gov)
  8. FDA (2023). Bisphenol A (BPA). Available from: Bisphenol A (BPA) | FDA 
  9. Government of Canada (2020). Safety of BPA. Available from: Bisphenol A (BPA) - Canada.ca
  10. Gov.UK (2024). BPA in plastics. Food Standards Agency. Available from: BPA in plastic | Food Standards Agency
  11. Ribeiro, E. et al. (2017). Occupational exposure to bisphenol A (BPA): a reality that still needs to be unveiled. Toxics 2017; 5(22): doi 10.3390. Available from: Occupational Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA): A Reality That Still Needs to Be Unveiled (semanticscholar.org)
  12. Duenas-Moreno, J. et al. (2023). Worldwide risk assessment of phthalates and bisphenol A in humans: the need for updating guidelines. Environment International; 181, Nov 2023: 108294. Available from: Worldwide risk assessment of phthalates and bisphenol A in humans: The need for updating guidelines (sciencedirectassets.com)
  13. WHO (2023). Infertility prevalence estimates 1990-2021. Available from: 9789240068315-eng.pdf (who.int)
  14. Molina-Lopez, A.M. et al. (2023). An overview of the health effects of bisphenol A from a one health perspective. Animals 2023; 13: 2439. Available from: (An Overview of the Health Effects of Bisphenol A from a One Health Perspective (nih.gov)
  15. Ohuma, E. et al. (2023). National, regional and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 2023; 402: 1261-71. Available from: National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis (thelancet.com) 
  16. March of Dimes (2023). The 2023 March of Dimes report card United States. Available from: MarchofDimesReportCard-UnitedStates.pdf 
  17. WCRF International (2022). Worldwide cancer data. Available from: Cancer trends - WCRF International 
  18. Sung, H. et al. (2024). Differences in cancer rates among adults born between 1920 and 1990 in the USA: an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. The Lancet Public Health 2024; 9: e583-93. Available from: Differences in cancer rates among adults born between 1920 and 1990 in the USA: an analysis of population-based cancer registry data (thelancet.com) 
  19. Attina, T. et al. (2016). Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the USA: a population-based disease burden and cost analysis. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology; 4(12) Available from: (12) (PDF) Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the USA: a population-based disease burden and cost analysis (researchgate.net)
  20. Hubbard, A.K. et al. (2019). Trends in international incidence of pediatric cancers in children under 5 years of age: 1988-2012. JNCI Cancer Spectrum (2019); 3(1): pkz007. Available from: Trends in International Incidence of Pediatric Cancers in Children Under 5 Years of Age: 1988–2012 - PMC (nih.gov)
  21. Chen, Y.M. et al. (2023). Mitigating the impact of bisphenol A exposure on mortality: Is diet the key? A cohort study based on NHANES. Ecotoxicology and Environment Safety; 267: 115629. Available from: Mitigating the impact of bisphenol A exposure on mortality: Is diet the key? A cohort study based on NHANES (sciencedirectassets.com) 
  22. Bao, W. et al. (2020). Association between bisphenol A exposure and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in US adults. Jama Network Open 2020 Aug; 3(8): e2011620. Available from: Association Between Bisphenol A Exposure and Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in US Adults - PMC (nih.gov)
  23. Guo, L. et al. (2024). Association of urinary bisphenol A with hyperlipidemia and all-cause mortality: NHANES 2003-2016. Available from: Association of urinary bisphenol A with hyperlipidemia and all-cause mortality: NHANES 2003–2016 - PMC (nih.gov)